Complaining About a Mortgage Lender
Complaining about a mortgage lender can be a lengthy process. However, borrowers should try to follow the proper procedure. Attempts to by-pass one of the steps in the complaints procedure may ultimately mean it takes longer to resolve the complaint.
Complaints Management Companies
Claims management companies offer to help consumers resolve disputes with a lender or other organisation. These companies will charge a fee for the services and / or may take a percentage of any compensation received. These companies must be authorised by the Ministry of Justice to operate legally.Complaints management companies often target consumers who have easily resolvable complaints. Many complaints management companies have started advertising their services to help borrowers reclaim unfair mortgage arrears fees. However, this is something that most consumers can easily arrange themselves. Indeed, the mortgage lenders in question may contact their customers and refund the fees before the borrower even becomes aware of their entitlement.
There is plenty of free advice available on issues related to mortgages. Borrowers should think carefully before deciding to pay a claims management company to help them.
Complaining Directly to the Lender
The first step in the complaints process is to complain directly to the mortgage lender, (or the mortgage broker if the complaint relates to their services). Most companies have their own internal complaints procedure and the borrower should find out what it is.Depending on the issue, it is possible that a telephone call to the right department could be enough to resolve it. However, in most cases it is likely that a complaint will have to be put in writing. Even if a complaint is being dealt with over the telephone, it is always a good idea to put everything in writing – and to request written confirmation of any responses or assurances given by the lender.
Generally, a formal letter should be sent to the mortgage lender setting out the details of the complaint and including relevant dates, reference numbers and facts. The letter should be as concise as possible, whilst also including all the relevant information. Long, rambling letters can be counter-productive - a genuine complaint can get lost amongst a series of less important grievances.
The lender should acknowledge receipt of this letter within five days and give a substantive response within one month. If the lender is not able to give a final response within this time they should contact the borrower to inform them of the progress being made. Once a final response has been received the borrower will have to decide whether they are happy with it.
Complaining to the Financial Ombudsman Service
A borrower, who has been through their lender’s complaints procedure and is not happy with the response received, may then consider taking their complaint to the Financial Ombudsman. A special form must be completed, which sets out the details of the complaint – this can be downloaded from the Financial Ombudsman’s website. Once the form has been completed and returned to the Financial Ombudsman they will decide whether or not they can help.The Financial Ombudsman aims to deal with all complaints within nine months. The length of time taken depends on the stage at which any resolution is reached. The first stage is relatively informal and may be completed within three months. This could apply where, for example, a complaint derives from a break-down in communication or a simple error which has been missed. The next stage is more formal and involves an investigation by the Financial Ombudsman Service followed by a formal report and recommendations. In a minority of cases, where either party refuses to accept the recommendations, an individual Ombudsman will make a final decision about the case.
It is possible to request that the case be reviewed if the decision is found to be unsatisfactory. If either party is still not happy with the final decision, they may wish to consider issuing court proceedings or using a mediation service. However, the majority of cases which go to the Financial Ombudsman are concluded there. It should be noted that a party who has accepted an Ombudsman’s recommendation may not then change their mind and issue a court case on the same point.
Re: Can Anything be Done Once your Home has been Repossessed?
My house was repossessed and I was evicted yesterday, my mental health is bad and I didn't…
Re: Do I Have a Counterclaim Against My Landlord?
My landlord brought a possession claim in the county court. I have serious grounds for counterclaim and…
Re: Can Anything be Done Once your Home has been Repossessed?
I fell into arrears due to ill health and had to move into my parents house while I…
Re: Shared Ownership and Repossession
I currently mortgage 25% and rent 75% my fixed deal comes to an end this year. I want a tracker mortgage but they told me…
Re: Repossession and Equitable Mortgages
Hi I have read that you are familiar with MCOB rules . Do you have knowledge of capitalisation of mortgage accounts and…
Re: Selling or Re-mortgaging your Home
I am facing a repossession hearing on March 23rd 2023. I am scared stiff to go to court. I want to get the case…
Re: Selling or Re-mortgaging your Home
I am facing a repossession hearing on March 23rd 2023. I am scared stiff to go to court. I want to get the case…
Re: Liability for Mortgage Shortfalls
The Mortgage Lender has now started to repeatedly leave messages sending letters to me regarding the shortfall of secured…
Re: House Sold For More Than the Arrears - What Happens?
My ex-partner of 4 years has applied to the County Court for an order for the sale and possession…
Re: Shared Ownership and Repossession
I part-own a flat in a block in London. Cladding has made it impossible to sell. I had to relocate due to work after being…